links for 2007-05-10
-
“A group of students on a field trip in Toronto investigating the pros and cons of public surveillance cameras ended up catching a slice of big city street hostility on their own cameras Tuesday. The Grade 12 students caught a road rage incident …”
links for 2007-05-09
-
“The US military is now posting video clips on YouTube showing US troops in combat and insurgents being bombed in a “boots on the ground” perspective of the Iraq war, officials said today.”
-
While I’m not sure of his motivations, I am nevertheless delighted with the uncharacteristically large amount of money being added to Education funding in the National Federal Budget! 🙂
-
Keynote talk on ‘Intermediation’ by Kate Hayles at the National Humanities Center’s 2006 Autonomy, Singularity, Creativity conference.
-
$US250+ million later, MySpace solves its Photobucket dilemma by buying the company out.
-
“British Prime Minister Tony Blair took to the Internet on Monday to congratulate Nicolas Sarkozy on winning France’s presidential election. Blair posted a message on video-sharing site YouTube, praising Sarkozy as ‘a strong leader.'”
-
A blog which documents and protests instances of internal academic bullying in universities. (Controversial, to say the least.) [Via]
Gail Jones shortlisted for the Miles Franklin Award
A huge congratulations to my UWA colleague, Gail Jones, on being shortlisted for this year’s Miles Franklin award for her new book Dreams of Speaking; Vintage (Random House Australia). Her competition this year is pretty impressive, too: Careless by Deborah Robertson; Carpenteria by Alexis Wright; and Theft: A Love Story by Peter Carey.
The winner will be announced on June 21st.
links for 2007-05-08
-
ABC TV series ‘Lost’ now has an finite life-span, of three more years, with 16 epsiodes a year. It’s a clever move since it (should!) mean that the ever-expanding list of unanswered questions will have to be designed in an answerable way!
-
“Many people go to YouTube to look at video clips. But what they really want to do is direct. Fortunately, for these people, God created the parody video.” (NY Times cynicism at its best…)
-
“Cellphone videos that depict a teenage girl being stoned to death by a crowd surfaced online last week.” These videos sparked national protests in Iraq – as they should – but a horrifyingly large crowd appears to have taken part in the stoning.
links for 2007-05-07
-
Audio podcasts of the four Battlestar Galactica papers presented at the recent MIT5.
-
A new YouTuber is initially mistaken for a new Lonelygirl15 (ie a commerical product, not an authethic ‘person’ per se) only to turn out to be a naive YouTuber being gamed by the proto-gurus of piggy-back social marketing.
-
Blogs: The New University Workspace? [Hosted by the Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences]As part of UWA’s Teaching Month I’m participating in a group blog exploring blogs as the “new university workplace”, including thinking on ePortfolios, digital literacy and writing in public.
Six Twitter Questions
Last week danah boyd posted a few questions about Twitter use. Since I answered each one in my head, I figure I’d post my answers here on the (very off) chance someone else is interested in my answers. danah’s questions are in italics …
First, the practical question. Can i quote you?
[X] Yes, and you *must* use my real name.
1. Why do you use Twitter? What do you like/dislike about it?
I love the immediacy of Twitter. I also like the fact that since Tweets are so small, people often write more personal things, letting you – over time – build a more holistic sense of them as a person not just as an academic (or whatever role that person has as their more careful public face, the face that is often more carefully maintained through other forms, such as blogging).
I don’t like the fact that, so often, I turn to Twitter only when I’m trying to procrastinate or distract myself from what I should “really” be doing!
2. Who do you think is reading your Tweets? Is this the audience you want? Why/why not? Tell me anything you think of relating to the audience for your Tweets.
I’ve got two discernable groups – firstly, Perth folks who Twitter and who knowingly form a sort of semi-web2.0 ensemble (the same folk you’d see at Perth Blog Meetups); secondly my academic and pseudo-academic ‘friends’ (and I use the quote marks since I’ve not physically met a number of the people I’d imagine in this category) who I share some interests with – be it digital culture, film, participatory culture or some combination thereof. These are both the people I imagine are reading me (or have subscribed to my Tweets) and also the people I read.
3. How do you read others’ Tweets? Do you read all of them? Who do you read/not read and why? Do you know them all?
As at 2. The only time I read new Tweets, now, is when someone I’m already reading either points to someone/something interesting or is engaged in one side of an interesting conversation and I want to hear the other half!
4. What content do you think is appropriate for a Tweet? What is inappropriate? Have you ever found yourself wanting to Tweet and then deciding against it? Why?
Inappropriate is a hard call – I’ve seen all sorts of colourful language and that seems in keeping with the immediacy and personal aspects of Twitter, but at the same time I wonder if those, aggregated, would be the sort of thing people want to be a reflection of themselves. I guess links to porn or other potentially offensive material has to be flagged as such – the use of TinyURLs means you’re less able to predict the contents of a link by it’s URL and so the onus (I think) is on the Twitterer to make it clear what they’ve linking to.
5. Are your Tweets public? Why/why not? How do you feel about people you don’t know coming across them? What about people you do know?
Mine are at present. I’m considering making them private as I’ve caught myself (only once so far) writing and then deleting a Tweet since it was venting about the workplace and the workplace could – at some distant point in the future – notice. That said, I’m never really sure how private ‘private’ turns out to be.
6. What do i need to know about why Twitter is/is not working for you or your friends?
Twitter, to me, works best in tandem with other forms. Most of the Twitterers and Twitterati I read are already bloggers, but their Tweets add a level of personality and personal depth which often isn’t visible in their blog posts (which are often more careful, especially because blogs and ‘personal profiles’ so often are synonymous in academia).
