[Last week I wrote the article below for The Conversation. Itâ€™s reproduced here mainly for my records â€¦]
Initial responses to Facebookâ€™s newly announced Graph Search (a name only a software engineer could love) appear to be split into two main camps:
- those who have celebrated the level of nuanced detail that can be retrieved by the tool
- those who suggest Graph Search represents further erosion of privacy on the social networking giant.
Both responses are entirely valid.
So, what is Graph Search?
If Graph Search works as advertised, then itâ€™s a technical marvel, allowing a huge array of complex searches using real questions, not just keywords.
Type in â€œWhich females in my area, around my age, support the Fremantle Dockers and are single?â€ and suddenly Facebook becomes a very specific and useful dating service. But this nuanced, â€œnatural languageâ€ searching also means that, for many users, it will be even easier to delve into the minute details that are seemingly hidden on your connectionsâ€™ Timelines.
The discussion around the release of Graph Search highlights something more important â€“ something that could be described as the â€œsocial media contradictionâ€.
â€œSocialâ€ implies conversation and other communication which we are accustomed to thinking of as ephemeral â€“ largely disappearing after the interaction is finished. Conversations in the street or telephone calls generally donâ€™t persist once theyâ€™re done.
To Facebook and other social media service providers, itâ€™s the media side of social media that matters. Media fills the databases â€“ the most valuable part of Facebook to marketers (the actual customers of Facebook) â€“ and this media has no expiration date.
Once entered, my relationship status, likes, photos, comments on friendsâ€™ photos, silly news stories I share and current location are all media elements which are in the Facebook database in perpetuity â€¦ unless I go to some pains to remove them.
Social media networks generally arenâ€™t run by governments, and rarely by philanthropists. Most are for-profit corporations. Facebook, Google, LinkedIn and most other online services have shareholders and are out to make a profit.
Different, but increasingly similar
Every time someone has a conversation on Facebook, or does a search on Google, that information gets stored in a database. Google and Facebook make their money by harnessing that enormous database and allowing advertisers to reach people making specific searches or discussing specific topics.
Graph Search makes the experience of Facebook more like the experience of Google. An effusive profile of the Graph Search team in Wired notes that the core software engineers have both defected from Google, including Lars Rasmussen who was one of the original creators of Google Maps (and the ill-fated Google Wave).
Notably, while Facebook is becoming more searchable, Google has been trying to gather more social information about its users by merging the privacy policies governing all of its products into one, and linking them all to the companyâ€™s social network, Google Plus.
These two online giants might have different origins, but they are looking increasingly alike.
Be it Google or Facebook, privacy is a key issue in social media, and one which is at the heart of the social media contradiction. At any given moment, the design of a service like Facebook may make some information feel private, even when itâ€™s technically not.
When Facebook shifted from profiles to Timelines, old conversations that were buried in the past were suddenly easy to find by scrolling back through the years. Graph Search takes that a step further, as anything in your history â€“ any past conversations, any old photos or anything else shared on Facebook â€“ will be searchable by others if your privacy settings allow it.
Limiting the visibility of a photo to â€œfriends of friendsâ€ doesnâ€™t just control who will see it initially on their newsfeed. It now controls who is able to search for that photo, in terms of location, caption, people tagged in it, or whatever other data exists about that photograph.
Facebook touts Graph Search as â€œprivacy awareâ€ but all that really means is the service will respect Facebookâ€™s already complicated privacy options.
Be aware, act sensibly
As Facebook makes our data accessible in yet another unexpected way, itâ€™s perhaps time to stop reacting to each change with outrage, and become aware of the ongoing social media contradiction.
Every online conversation we have, every photo we upload, every item we share goes into a database. Corporations will try to harness that database to make money. That doesnâ€™t make Google or Facebook malicious, it just makes them a business.
The social media contradiction occurs when we imagine Facebook or Google to be a service, not a business. If we keep in mind anything shared will be stored forever, analysed, and harnessed to make money, then, like Facebook, weâ€™ll be aware that social media is media, not just social.
As users, our business is to try and be aware of the privacy settings available on these services and take our options seriously. Facebook might change how their database is accessed and utilised, but if weâ€™ve only shared something with our Facebook friends, theyâ€™re the only ones who can search for it.
Of course, if itâ€™s not on Facebook at all, no-one can use Facebook to find it.