<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution of Storage Infographic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/</link>
	<description>Tama's thoughts about digital culture, whatever that might mean ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst of Perth</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-21625</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst of Perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/#comment-21625</guid>
		<description>The whole point of an infographic is to be able to represent information at a glance. This is just a really bad one. Their use of 3 different scales was also a very bad idea. The usb one gets closer, but it&#039; doesn&#039;t really convey much since there is just one pic and you have to read the numbers anyway. A wheelbarrow or skip full of floppys or whatever is what they should have done. That would make the point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point of an infographic is to be able to represent information at a glance. This is just a really bad one. Their use of 3 different scales was also a very bad idea. The usb one gets closer, but it&#039; doesn&#039;t really convey much since there is just one pic and you have to read the numbers anyway. A wheelbarrow or skip full of floppys or whatever is what they should have done. That would make the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TamaLeaver</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-21619</link>
		<dc:creator>TamaLeaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/#comment-21619</guid>
		<description>Stu, all fair, although adding a timeline might be harder given it&#039;s part of a larger comparative graphic - really I might just focus on the USB = box near the bottom - that&#039;s the interesting story. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stu, all fair, although adding a timeline might be harder given it&#039;s part of a larger comparative graphic &#8211; really I might just focus on the USB = box near the bottom &#8211; that&#039;s the interesting story. <img src='http://www.tamaleaver.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TamaLeaver</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-21618</link>
		<dc:creator>TamaLeaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/#comment-21618</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, some of the colouring is wrong, but I like the idea, at least ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, some of the colouring is wrong, but I like the idea, at least &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-21624</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/#comment-21624</guid>
		<description>An interesting subject indeed, but the infographic contains some glaring errors. For e.g the CD says 700Mb yet it is graphed as 7Mb! dual layer DVD, Blu-ray, DL Blu-ray and flash drive should all be green not red. In addition it&#039;s kind of difficult to compare these things at a glance. It might be more helpful to have a major shift in callibration with the graphing to give a real visual impression of just how dramatic the change has been. A timeline would help understanding too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting subject indeed, but the infographic contains some glaring errors. For e.g the CD says 700Mb yet it is graphed as 7Mb! dual layer DVD, Blu-ray, DL Blu-ray and flash drive should all be green not red. In addition it&#039;s kind of difficult to compare these things at a glance. It might be more helpful to have a major shift in callibration with the graphing to give a real visual impression of just how dramatic the change has been. A timeline would help understanding too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Worst of Perth</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/comment-page-1/#comment-21617</link>
		<dc:creator>The Worst of Perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2009/11/30/evolution-of-storage-infographic/#comment-21617</guid>
		<description>Just what an infographic shouldn&#039;t be, confusing and hard to compare and shouldn&#039;t the dvd and blu ray be green dots? This could be done much better. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what an infographic shouldn&#039;t be, confusing and hard to compare and shouldn&#039;t the dvd and blu ray be green dots? This could be done much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

