<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-08-01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/08/01/links-for-2007-08-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/08/01/links-for-2007-08-01/</link>
	<description>Tama's thoughts about digital culture, whatever that might mean ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; When is a robot&#8230; Zigzaggery</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/08/01/links-for-2007-08-01/comment-page-1/#comment-6627</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; When is a robot&#8230; Zigzaggery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/08/01/links-for-2007-08-01/#comment-6627</guid>
		<description>[...] Tama links to the Times Online “50 best Robot movies” today.  Of course, I have my own reservations about the list (although I am very distracted by SF robots that have only appeared in print, and often don&#8217;t think so much about those on film), but the main thing that interested me was looking at all the comments.  There were so many little arguments over what belongs in the category &#8220;robot&#8221;, and just so many people who were absolutely sure they were right and everyone else was wrong! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tama links to the Times Online “50 best Robot movies” today.  Of course, I have my own reservations about the list (although I am very distracted by SF robots that have only appeared in print, and often don&#8217;t think so much about those on film), but the main thing that interested me was looking at all the comments.  There were so many little arguments over what belongs in the category &#8220;robot&#8221;, and just so many people who were absolutely sure they were right and everyone else was wrong! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

