<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mary-Jane Watson &#8230; Likes to Wash Peter&#8217;s Spider-suit?!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/</link>
	<description>Tama's thoughts about digital culture, whatever that might mean ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:42:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensan_Oni</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-22100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensan_Oni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/#comment-22100</guid>
		<description>And BOY, I should check the dates before I comment. I&#039;m sorry! I didn&#039;t realize this was an old dead issue. *blush*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And BOY, I should check the dates before I comment. I&#8217;m sorry! I didn&#8217;t realize this was an old dead issue. *blush*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kensan_Oni</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-22099</link>
		<dc:creator>Kensan_Oni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/#comment-22099</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just me... but I don&#039;t read this as &quot;Mary Jane doing Laundry&quot;. I read this as &quot;Mary Jane Snooping Around Peter&#039;s Laundry&quot;. I mean, really, why the hell would Mary do his laundry? Even when they are married, he&#039;s the one doing all the work, while she is out being a superstar. You can&#039;t HAVE Mary Jane Watson any other way.

I can see how this can be read wrong, easily, but Mary Jane doing Laundry? Out of Character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me&#8230; but I don&#8217;t read this as &#8220;Mary Jane doing Laundry&#8221;. I read this as &#8220;Mary Jane Snooping Around Peter&#8217;s Laundry&#8221;. I mean, really, why the hell would Mary do his laundry? Even when they are married, he&#8217;s the one doing all the work, while she is out being a superstar. You can&#8217;t HAVE Mary Jane Watson any other way.</p>
<p>I can see how this can be read wrong, easily, but Mary Jane doing Laundry? Out of Character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exo</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-20150</link>
		<dc:creator>Exo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/#comment-20150</guid>
		<description>Seeing this image is disappointing at best.

I&#039;m a white male who reads his fair share of comics (mostly DC titles) and am often disappointed by the images of women in the medium. More often than not the writing of female characters is fine - there are plenty of strong, independent, real women characters to be found, but the visual side tends to get a bit out of control (it would be nice to see a female character who DIDN&#039;T have enormous boobs and no waist).

But then I think - wait a minute. Aren&#039;t the majority of guys in the medium chiselled jaw muscle men who pretty much ALL have six-packs of abs?

The medium is not typically known for it&#039;s subtlety, it&#039;s true. BUT, all that being said, I still have a problem with this image of Mary Jane. When you see Spiderman&#039;s image, he&#039;s generally seen in a pose of action. Why? Because it symbolises who he is. To have Mary Jane bending over with her boobs out, g-string showing and happily washing her man&#039;s clothing (whether it means to or not) marginalises who she is.

I will come out and say right now that I am not a major feminist. I respect women they way I respect men, and am not typically an alarmist who calls anything even marginally inappropriate &#039;sexist&#039;... but this image is poorly conceived, and yes... sexist.

There&#039;s a difference between showing someone as sexy, and marginalising who they are. I&#039;m not certain that this was the intention, but come on... the people who made this really don&#039;t appear to have thought it through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this image is disappointing at best.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a white male who reads his fair share of comics (mostly DC titles) and am often disappointed by the images of women in the medium. More often than not the writing of female characters is fine &#8211; there are plenty of strong, independent, real women characters to be found, but the visual side tends to get a bit out of control (it would be nice to see a female character who DIDN&#8217;T have enormous boobs and no waist).</p>
<p>But then I think &#8211; wait a minute. Aren&#8217;t the majority of guys in the medium chiselled jaw muscle men who pretty much ALL have six-packs of abs?</p>
<p>The medium is not typically known for it&#8217;s subtlety, it&#8217;s true. BUT, all that being said, I still have a problem with this image of Mary Jane. When you see Spiderman&#8217;s image, he&#8217;s generally seen in a pose of action. Why? Because it symbolises who he is. To have Mary Jane bending over with her boobs out, g-string showing and happily washing her man&#8217;s clothing (whether it means to or not) marginalises who she is.</p>
<p>I will come out and say right now that I am not a major feminist. I respect women they way I respect men, and am not typically an alarmist who calls anything even marginally inappropriate &#8216;sexist&#8217;&#8230; but this image is poorly conceived, and yes&#8230; sexist.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference between showing someone as sexy, and marginalising who they are. I&#8217;m not certain that this was the intention, but come on&#8230; the people who made this really don&#8217;t appear to have thought it through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>ah, nevermind, should learn to read all the post before commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, nevermind, should learn to read all the post before commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-3218</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamaleaver.net/2007/05/13/mary-jane-watson-likes-to-wash-peters-spider-suit/#comment-3218</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://logansrogue.livejournal.com/947905.html#cutid1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;spiderman version&lt;/a&gt; that one of my friends drew (and has recently been noticed by quite a few popular blooging sites)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the <a href="http://logansrogue.livejournal.com/947905.html#cutid1" rel="nofollow">spiderman version</a> that one of my friends drew (and has recently been noticed by quite a few popular blooging sites)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

